The Role of Institutional Investors in Equity Trading: An Explanation of the Home Bias Puzzle∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper postulates that management performance evaluation is a source of divergence between institutional investors and households’ optimal portfolio decisions. In a partial equilibrium setting, the objective of a representative household is modeled as the maximization of expected utility (an increasing and concave function, in order to accommodate risk aversion) of final wealth. Yet, the institutional investor is assumed to maximize utility (same type of function) of final wealth minus a benchmark. Under these assumptions, the optimal portfolio choices of both types of investors are derived and compared. The specific objective function of the representative institutional investor is shown to induce a divergence between her optimal portfolio and that of the representative household. We study the effects of this optimal strategy in asset trading on a simple one-period equilibrium model and obtain a multibeta CAPM; as a novelty, a new factor-risk is brought into the analysis: the active management risk. This new beta is defined as the normalized (to the benchmark’s variance) covariance between asset’s excess return and the excess return of the market over the benchmark index. We test this model using a data sample of 220 US securities and the S&P 500 as the benchmark index. The sample consists of monthly returns from January, 1973 through December, 1997. We show that the index is relevant in order to explain the excess return of domestic securities. The test supports the predictions of the model. As an extension of the previous results to an international framework, we show that the model provides an alternative explanation of the home bias puzzle. In a partial equilibrium setting, the specific objective function of the representative institutional investor induces a home bias in her portfolio. The bias obtains for certain (and plausible) combinations of the volatilities of domestic and foreign asset markets and the covariances between the domestic and international securities.
منابع مشابه
Loss Aversion, Asymmetric Market Comovements, and the Home Bias
Loss aversion has been used to explain why a high equity premium might be consistent with plausible levels of risk aversion. The intuition is that the different utility impact of wealth gains and losses leads loss-averse investors to behave similarly to investors with high risk aversion. But if so, should these agents not perceive larger gains from international diversification than standard ex...
متن کاملThe determinants of international investment and attention allocation: Using internet search query data
a r t i c l e i n f o This paper explores the joint determination of home bias and attention allocation. We overcome the typical challenge associated with evaluating attention allocation theories by using a new internet search query dataset to measure how much information investors decide to process. Employing an instrumental variables approach, we find empirical evidence of a two-way causality...
متن کاملStock (Mis) Pricing and Diversification in Africa: Evidence from Selected African Exchanges
T his paper ascertains the extent of mispricing in equity portfolios, mispricing-divestment relation, and the role of African equities as risk diversification strategies during commodity market turbulence. Following Baur and Lucey (2010), one identifies an arbitrary commodity market crisis to be 1%, 5%, and 10% declining moments in returns. However, their approach is extended by usin...
متن کاملHome Bias in Portfolios and Taxation of Asset Income
There is now extensive evidence that individual investors have a strong tendency to invest in domestic rather than foreign equity. This “home bias in portfolios can potentially have important implications for economic behavior and economic policy. For one, it suggests that extra savings in a country will be invested primarily at home, consistent with the evidence for a lack of international cap...
متن کاملAnchoring Heuristic and the Equity Premium Puzzle
I model a scenario in which investors do not know the payoff distributions of relatively newer firms and use the payoff distribution of similar well-established firms as starting points. The starting distributions are then adjusted for size, volatility, and other differences. Anchoring bias (Tversky and Kahneman (1974)) implies that such adjustments typically fall short. I show that adjusting c...
متن کامل